So in Zelma v. Wonder Group, Inc. 2025 WL 2976546 (D. N.J. Oct. 22, 2025) the Plaintiff appears to have used AI to generate a brief opposing Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss. (Seems like a category 2 situation since Plaintiff isn’t a lawyer.) Here is what the Court said on the subject (this is long but good): Plaintiff included fabricated quotations from real cases, and at other points, cited to cases that, to the best of the Court’s knowledge, do not exist. See id.
AI FAILURES IN TCPA: First TCPA Decision Addressing a Party’s Use of GenAI in Briefing is Out–And It Sets the Table Well
